Vegetarian vs. Carnivore Feeding Enrichment in a Pack of Captive Iberian Wolves (Canis lupus signatus): Towards Individual and Species-typical Needs?
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Vegetarian vs. Carnivore Feeding Enrichment in a Pack of Captive Iberian Wolves (Canis lupus signatus): Towards Individual and Species-typical Needs?

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare two different types of feeding enrichment (vegetarian vs. carnivore) through the daily activity, space use and inter-individual distances in a captive Iberian wolf ( Canis lupus signatus ) pack housed at the Barcelona Zoo. Multifocal sampling methods were used for data collection and instantaneous scans were made at 15-min intervals during sessions of varying duration. The enrichment sessions were carried out once a day, three days per week –Monday, Wednesday, and Friday- repeating the delivered schedule of items every two weeks. Thus, both feeding phases included six different enrichment sessions; the vegetarian phase included chopped fruit – apples inside a burlap sack, scattered bananas, peaches, frozen pears, and oranges, and kiwis inside a frozen water block; the carnivore phase included animal products -beef raw lean meat inside a burlap sack or inside a frozen water block, horse leg, live carp, frozen rabbit skin and live grasshoppers-. There were individual differences in the response to both feeding enrichments. Only the carnivore enrichment provoked statistically significant differences in exploration, locomotion, inactivity and not visible. Only the indeterminate zone showed changes during both enrichment phases. The inter-individual distance between Iberian wolves was statistically significantly lower during both feeding enrichment phases –especially during the carnivore as compared to the vegetarian phase- than during the baseline phase. Enrichment items designed more according to the natural history of these animals seem to have a greater capacity to improve the wolf welfare. Future studies on this species are necessary to improve husbandry techniques, welfare, and conservation programs.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View